Domains for Sale -

Thanks for checking out our site

Domains for Sale header image 2

Red Skelton’s Pledge of Allegiance

December 29th, 2010 by admin


Red Skelton’s Pledge of Allegiance

Tags:   · · 25 Comments

25 responses so far ↓

  • @ManuelHung You, sir, are a badass.

  • Go suck on a lemon, you turd-ass tea-bag morons.

  • Buddhism excises the cancer of nationalism for all sexualities, genders and races.
    Flagworship is unislamic. Only Allah may be revered.

  • He couldn’t have said it better. Sad to think about how many don’t agree with Red’s statements. Do we not ask ourselves why this has happened and more importantly, what we can do about it?

  • “one Nation Under God” is the most beautiful line that I have and ever will say in this lifetime. God bless all of you. Don’t take your freedom in America for granted. You are the envy and beauty of the countries around you. Never forget it!

  • @Chakrila Yeah, like you and ObaMao who’s using a classic Cloward-Piven model to try and destroy the U.S. correct? You Leftist piece of shit…

  • @Charonveritas weird, the “leftish-socialists” i know respect america too. guess i shouldnt have expected anything else from a right-wing neonazi huh

  • As a social studies teacher, I require my students to learn the meaning of each word in the Pledge of Allegiance. I would love to have met Red Skelton’s teacher. It’s never been explained more beautifully!
    May God Bless America!

  • America FUCK YEAH!!! Greatest country on the motherfuckin’ planet. FUCK YEAH!!
    GO TEAM AMERICA!!!!!!!

  • @marksman2142 — none so blind – -

  • Wow, there are 93 Leftist-Socialists that viewed this…

    It’s a shame more people don’t take the Pledge as seriously…

  • It’s amazing how he predicted that America would turn so politically correct that we would try to get rid of “Under God.” Can someone please explain to me why we would ever do this!?

  • America shits on the 93 dislikes.

  • This needs to be seen by every American! I really mean every American man, woman and child. As Red would say. ” May God Bless. “

  • We sure could use more people like Red nowadays….

  • @bejon2007 I wouldn’t say it makes it a prayer. Why not recite it with pride anyway? Do hate God or the idea of God so much that you cant?

  • Hi Red, may you rest in peace. We still love you. Thanks for this, teaching moment. Wes

  • @qixxxz If you mean “freedom” as in free time as in time not consumed by the struggle of keepin Body&Soul tagether while stayin out’a prison- then I agree. Otherwise, I say it’s about MONEY- PURE & SIMPLE-
    *Governments-Elections-ETC, – are, is, was & always will be about CLASS WARFARE as in Blood&Treasure. The Election part is an attempt to reach a settling point without the bloodshed. Government is about how to deal with the greedy & the needy. Nations are about RealEstate – DominionDomain.

  • @isaysee The powers that be like us all divided into our small powerless groups and this is how they do it. Insert god or gay or black or rich or uneducated or right to life ect. ect. The list goes on and on. We all want the same damn thing. We need to be UNITED to get it. Its freedom !

  • @qixxxz -why indeed — Qui Bono – & – Qui BonoED — it happened under Ike. I’m not to familiar with what election was coming up at that time- but my suspicion is this was a proto type of the “GodGuns&Gays”, strategy designed to divide the common people, attain political power and blind & bleed the Mid&LowerClasses & CounterAct the NewDeal & jip them & the WW2 vets & their children out of what was ppromised them. Kennedy won W/House, but it sure worked later on down the road. *Liberty&Just4All

  • @bejon2007 Here here!! I second this thought!

  • @spwright11 the preamble declares,coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion,an amendment was proposed by inserting “Jesus Christ,” so that it would read “A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;” the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan,the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.T. Jefferson

  • @lefty41681 There is and never was separation of church and state. The correct interpretation, is the government would never be able to interfere with practicing ones faith. Something the left wants to control.

  • @mrmcgrane What if they had added “Praise Alla” instead of “Under God”, would you still say that it is not a violation of the separation of church and state?
    The man that came up with the pledge was a minster, he saw no reason to bring God into the pledge.
    You said that our founding fathers wanted us to be able to say God in public, they also wanted to make sure we were not forced to say God either. Too have freedom of religion does by it’s very nature mean freedom from it as well.